Tuesday, June 11, 2019
The trail of Tears Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words
The trail of Tears - Essay ExampleOver 15,000 of our members, led by Chief John Ross, swallow signed a petition in protest of this inconclusive treaty. Despite this, the United States Supreme Court dismissed our concerns and this year ratified the treaty. We have straightaway been given two years to migrate voluntarily to the west, away from our own country, to unfamiliar territory beyond the Mississippi. Forcible removal has been threatened if we do non leave on our own.Citizens of the United States, we do not wish to leave our lands, nor should we be forced to do so. Such a move would not be in our best interests indeed it would be fatal to us as a nation. Firstly, it is an area completely unknown to us, and in addition is already in use(p) by other Indian nations who would not take kindly to encroachers upon their territory. We would be forced into close proximity with neighbors with whom we do not share a actors line or customs. The territory is also inadequately supplied w ith wood and water, making it much harder for us to survive.We appeal to the sense of fairness in the citizens of the United States, because previous to the false treaty, all agreements upheld our sovereign rights. Those treaties explicitly acknowledged us to be a separate people, in a separate territory comprising our own country, and were supposed to be secured and protected by your government. In the 1832 Supreme Court case Worcester v. Georgia, the majority opinion written by Chief Justice John Marshall rendered a judgment firmly upholding our rights. It stated, in part, that Indian nations should be regarded as distinct political communities, with their own territorial boundaries in which exclusive authority is exercised, as guaranteed by the United States.Although the case specifically addressed the legal question of whether the State of Georgia could forcibly seize any person residing within our nation with our permission, it straightforwardly addresses our territorial and s overeign rights.